Can we make a "Christopher Reeves" fly again? Can we save Alex P. Keaton from the withering effects of Parkinson's disease? We, as intellectual beings,
are continually trying to crack the code in the field of medicine. Can we find
a cure for cancer? We defeated polio and even eliminated smallpox.
Certainly, we should be able to come up with a solution to eradicate many of these
other deadly diseases? What about Alzheimer's or Dementia? Many have sought out new methods and traveled down new
avenues with the hope of defeating these diseases. Some have looked towards
"Out of the box" methods of thinking for accomplishing this mission.
Experimental methods, such as using stem cells for research as being a possible
route towards a cure, have opened the doors to the realms of possibility. But we
now find ourselves approaching a moral dilemma. The ethical line to establish a
boundary between how to approach a medical cure for some of the most serious diseases of our time and what can actually be utilized to achieve this
goal is pushing us to an impasse. It is something that must be handled and rooted in some sense of morality. But have we, as a nation, lost our morality and ethical standing in favor of propping up an ideological viewpoint.
Stem cell research has always been
touted as a new frontier for medical science (By the way, be aware that the
term "Science" also doubles as a code word by Atheists as their
ruling "God"...which means they do acknowledge SOME higher power. But
that's an argument for another day. For the sake of this tirade, it will
encompass both meanings). How do you effectively obtain the stem cells? Through
donated tissue? Who would donate these cells? Would it be from consenting
adults, wanting to donate to "Science"? Or will it be from recycling
remaining body parts and organs of aborted babies? Sounds barbaric, doesn't it?
Sadly, this practice has been uncovered as a regular method of maximizing the
recyclable yield of a "Sacrificed" aborted "Growth tissue,
thingy". It's downright sinister and despicable.
When the
arguments first began on the subject of "fetal" stem cell tissue's possibility of being an effective tool for use in medical research, it was framed in the media as a new world with endless
benefits. To me, this was a very disturbing statement. When I was first made aware of this idea, I
began to make the case that we are about to embark upon a new ECONOMIC frontier. It is
opening the door to building a new market. A market built upon demand
that must now being fulfilled. You must ask yourself, "How do you feel that
the demand of this new market is now looking to be filled with baby
parts"? How would you make the supply side meet demand? According to
Planned Parenthood, you do so by taking aborted babies and using their
parts! You
even try and make it more palatable by giving it a "Sauna Spa Like"
air of ambiance. And as you harvest the baby parts while the former
mother sips hot tea in a robe, hopefully, you'll take a cut enough to
purchase a modern luxury muscle sports car in exchange for 6 month old livers
and hearts. Apparently, this is a practice that's been going on for years! The
heart, liver, and the kidney...all the things that are involved with this
"tissue growth" are now a part of the Stem Express stem cell tissue research
company's inventory. The procedures are conducted in "less crunchy"
ways to preserve the valuable "inventory" in order to obtain maximized
utilization. In fact, many of these organs are now pre-ordered, with the objective of extracting a fetus in a manner as to ensure they are not damaged and intact being “baked in” to the
procedure, just as the costs are “baked into” the purchasing order. They can be
haggled over to cover these "costs", all while the harvesters are fainting as
they are identifying and extracting fetal organs. The harvesters are being
told, "You'll probably never get used to this". And you shouldn't. It's a telling statement
that underscores the brutality and callousness required to perform this chore. They’ve even eluded to the
possibility that if a baby was scheduled for the abortion actually arrives "via stork delivery" earlier than
expected, it can be put down like a sick dalmatian and will be added to the inventory of butchery. This void of ethics and morality cannot be understated and should be applied to every
other component of their actions in every aspect of their daily lives. Character DOES matter.
God DOES work in mysterious ways.
Much like the "on camera", unexpected response to the removal of God from the DNC
Presidential Convention Platform, where Gods inclusion was booed by them 3
times, we are being given a window into the soul of the progressive movement's core. In
contrast, the crux of any conservative's guidance is the divine morality that
we look towards in order to govern us as we govern ourselves, or if elected, use to govern the electorate. The progressive movement have
remove GOD and divine morality, and in turn, have placed their own authority in a station of
supremacy. In doing so, they have dismantled their moral compass and have lend
themselves to become butchers, thieves, and authoritative demigods. They are
ultimate authority, judge, and jury. Why are they above scrutiny? Why are they
in a special class?How are they able to decide who lives, how they live, and
how they'll die? These are typical questions that arise when pondering
progressive ideology. The real question should be, "What are our
values?" Ask yourself this question and then choose which side you wish to
be on. My choice is Life and Freedom. What's yours?
